For coronavirus? You know it was approved in 24 hours right?Yes it is. Provide citation that it isn't an approved drug.
For coronavirus? You know it was approved in 24 hours right?Yes it is. Provide citation that it isn't an approved drug.
You are such a dumb fukcing piece of shitYes,
It's been approved only 24 hours after clinical trial!!!!!!!! That's unbelievable. Literally unbelievable. As in, I cannot believe it is true.
Because it's not. Trump continues to misinform the American people.
That's not what Trump claimed is it? My point was that it was misinformation to say this was FDA approved for a corona virus treatment in only 24 hours. It's not.You are such a dumb fukcing piece of shit
Don’t you understand the term “off label use” and standard of care. I can prescribe that tomorrow for Coronavirus and there isn’t a damn medical board who’s going to take away my license for prescribing it in an emergency
Stick with topics that you know about, which is pretty much none. Stupid
Got it, but does it really matter? It’s a treatment and you can receive it. I’m glad our president is giving the panicked public hopeThat's not what Trump claimed is it? My point was that it was misinformation to say this was FDA approved for a corona virus treatment in only 24 hours. It's not.
You’re incorrect It’s not FDA approved for lichen planopilaris (scarring hair loss), yet it’s given all the time. There are ABSOLUTELY no FDA studies for this indication and that’s for freaking hair loss"I can prescribe" like you're a doctor when if that was the case you would know you can't ethically use a drug without FDA approval to treat a disease, that has a 1% mortality rate, off of one single trial.
He's hoping for this to be as bad as possible. The higher the death count, the happier he is
You’re incorrect It’s not FDA approved for lichen planopilaris (scarring hair loss), yet it’s given all the time. There are ABSOLUTELY no FDA studies for this indication and that’s for freaking hair loss
You’re straying from the point. You’re harping on FDA approval. Isn’t that the point of your argument?
It’s a treatment that’s available for this condition in desperate situations or less. That’s what you should be concentrating on. Not the president’s wording
Once again, the left concentrating on the “Gotcha Trump” wording more than the health and hope of Americans. Shocking
Where did Trump call it “a game changer?”https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fau...ps-declaration-malaria-drug/story?id=69716324
Fauci is already bring this into question. Trump saying something does not make it true. Hopefully this, or something does end up working out but way to early at this point for Trump to be calling it a game changer. And no, we dont need our president to give us false hope, we need him to be realistic and honest.
Where did Trump call it “a game changer?”
It’s not false hope. There are some people who are in an absolute panic, and this IS HOPEFUL
Ok. Missed that.Umm, at his press conference yesterday, it was all over the news.
Umm, at his press conference yesterday, it was all over the news.
It is false hope. listen to Fauci, not Trump. Is it possible it could work out? Sure. But at this point it is way to early to be making people think that is true. Hope doesnt change science. We need honest and realistic.
So on Thursay Trump calls it a "game changer". Cut to today 'When asked if the drug was promising Friday, Fauci, standing next to Trump, said “the answer is no” because “the evidence you’re talking about … is anecdotal evidence.”
Quality post. Glad to see there are people out there who can provide ACCURATE information when some of us simply don’t have the time and have to settle for the BS being thrown out there thinking that it may be trueReading your post in the Dementia Joe tread about the importance of sharing the full quote, its odd that you chose not to use Trump's full and actual "game changer" quote here. Instead, you depict it as being black and white. No grey. Its funny when accuracy becomes important to you, and when it becomes secondary.
Your credibility here is a fukcing null set.
In case anyone is interested in what was actually said, and not some hack depiction, here you go;
""And I think it's going to be very exciting. I think it could be a game changer. And maybe not. Maybe not, but I think it could be, based on what I see, it could be a game changer. Very powerful, they’re very powerful," he said.
A = { integrity, credibility, intellectual honesty }
B = { @Cubs79 }
A ∩ B = { }
WTF is happening here? Are these 2 the same person? Have I sampled too much bourbon tonight?Quality post. Thanks! Glad to see there are people out there who can provide ACCURATE information when some of us simply don’t have the time and have to settle for the BS being thrown out there thinking that it may be true
lol! We all have! It’s a complete coincidence. Absolutely no correlation. However, UCFMike has some quality takes.WTF is happening here? Are these 2 the same person? Have I sampled too much bourbon tonight?
Reading your post in the Dementia Joe tread about the importance of sharing the full quote, its odd that you chose not to use Trump's full and actual "game changer" quote here. Instead, you depict it as being black and white. No grey. Its funny when accuracy becomes important to you, and when it becomes secondary.
Your credibility here is a fukcing null set.
In case anyone is interested in what was actually said, and not some hack depiction, here you go;
""And I think it's going to be very exciting. I think it could be a game changer. And maybe not. Maybe not, but I think it could be, based on what I see, it could be a game changer. Very powerful, they’re very powerful," he said.
A = { integrity, credibility, intellectual honesty }
B = { @Cubs79 }
A ∩ B = { }
Unbelievable we have to be so partisan in these times.
I see nothing wrong with the President of the United States giving hope to the people based upon information he’s received. The Google website turned out to be real. Fauci today went back up to the podium and agreed with Trump. Drs are currently prescribing this drug and it’s been shown to be effective
I forget where we are with intelligence agencies these days. Do we think they’re all full of shit because of Iraqi WMDs and Suleimani or do we believe them again because they warned about something that is an ever present threat?
Well. Since Trump is saying that it COULD HELP and is exciting and Fauci isn’t saying that it couldn’t, then I guess that they ARE agreeingFauci absolutely did not agree with Trump.
I think it’s funny to think that you’re doing something valuable in “questioning our leaders” and confident enough to condescend to others. When it comes to this, you don’t know your ass from a hole in the ground. It’s really quite comical.The intelligence agencies are like anything else, they can be wrong at times and be correct at times. In this case, we have known about and have been monitoring the virus since November, so it wasnt hard to predict it would reach the US. But hey, you do you and do everything you can to avoid holding Trump accountable, it is only a major health crisis and our economy free falling.
Well. Since Trump is saying that it COULD HELP and is exciting and Fauci isn’t saying that it couldn’t, then I guess that they ARE agreeing
However, this now isn’t about anything other than you not liking a Trump, so as usual the original topic has gone astray
I think it’s funny to think that you’re doing something valuable in “questioning our leaders” and confident enough to condescend to others. When it comes to this, you don’t know your ass from a hole in the ground. It’s really quite comical.
Tell me, what have you done to help the situation?
It only seems partisan because democrats are consistently on the side of science and you guys are consistently not. There's nothing partisan about not touting a treatment as a cure or medical drug before it is clinically tested. It only seems partisan because you all take the side of lunacy and we have to step in and remind you of what the actual educated scientists and doctors are saying.Unbelievable we have to be so partisan in these times.
You’re completely incapable of holding an intelligent conversation and are actually as obsessed with Trump in a negative way as much or more than any of his supporters. Your basically on here constantly bashing him and twisting the facts for the sole purpose of fitting your sick narratives. Your pompous and stubborn as hell which has completely destroyed your credibility as you have been called out on stupid and incorrect takes on multiple occasionsDude, you kiss Trump's ass every chance you get, so cut the crap that it's just about people hating Trump. That way of thinking goes both ways. You think I hate Trump, I think you are completely incapable of holding accountable for anything and view him as a cult leader. So there we go.
And I am sorry we are going through what could potentially be the biggest crisis of most of our lifetimes, and we have a president who in my view is completely unprepared and in over his head, and you are just worried about people liking him.
You’re completely incapable of holding an intelligent conversation and are actually as obsessed with Trump in a negative way as much or more than any of his supporters. Your basically on here constantly bashing him and twisting the facts for the sole purpose of fitting your sick narratives. Your pompous and stubborn as hell which has completely destroyed your credibility as you have been called out on stupid and incorrect takes on multiple occasions
Trump is doing a fine job in my opinion and you have nothing constructive or productive to say about any single move that he has taken including closing our borders almost immediately. We are experiencing basically a once in a lifetime crisis event as you have stated and no president or leader could have been prepared for this in a country of 330 million, that is so vastly spread out. You think that the only job president of the United States is to deal with a pandemic.
People like yourself have made such stupid ass, irresponsible comments like the reason for this is that Trump has downsized parts of the CDC, 2 years ago or that he’s the reason why there hasn’t been enough testing, yet you have a presidential candidate who basically would have delayed in stoppage of this virus from it’s main source in China based on his comments
Your max TDS mixed in with your pompous stubbornness makes you incapable of having a normal back and forth conversation with other human beings. Additionally, you keep going on tangents and can’t stick to an original topic because it’s all about your obsession with Trump
You never actually constructively start ANY topic. Has anyone else noticed that??!!!
You are such a dumb fukcing piece of shit
Don’t you understand the term “off label use” and standard of care. I can prescribe that tomorrow for Coronavirus and there isn’t a damn medical board who’s going to take away my license for prescribing it in an emergency
Stick with topics that you know about, which is pretty much none. Stupid
You do what you need to do to save lives. Fortunately, right now, we are not at that point. No physician at the point is blatantly and recklessly prescribing Hydroxychloroquine randomly to a friend or patient that may have Coronavirus. That’s ridiculous. Seriously ill patients are in hospitalsI'm pretty sure the HIV drug isnt indicated for coronavirus treatment and yet it's being prescribed. Unless and until there is a drug indicated, it isnt unethical for a doctor to try alternate treatments.
You do what you need to do to save lives. Fortunately, right now, we are not at that point. No physician at the point is blatantly and recklessly prescribing Hydroxychloroquine randomly to a friend or patient that may have Coronavirus. That’s ridiculous. Seriously ill patients are in hospitals
Can we circle back to this thread? Trump said the FDA had approved this drug and everyone celebrated. I said, not so fast my friends, and got accused of wanting old people killed.
Turns out Trump was wrong. People trusting him were wrong. I was right to be cautious because I've seen this many times before. I've followed drug approvals from breakthrough to market delivery. I understand the process, the president does not.
Is anyone starting to see the problem with him as the leader of this? He is just wrong or lies intentionally or unintentionally all the time.
The drug is not approved by the FDA, Trump doesn't understand FDA approval. @Crazyhole
It's literally not approved for covid19, has been approved by FDA for other shit for decades. OP said it got approved in 24 hours for covid19. This is an example of "right to try" which is great.
A guy in LA literally just had Cholonique prescribed to him when he was on his last leg with COVID19 and it saved his life. From about to die to totally fine over the course of a few hours.
https://www.foxla.com/news/a-man-wi...the-drug-used-to-treat-malaria-saved-his-life
Gee, seems kinda impossible if the FDA "had not approved it" like you assured us, huh?
It's literally not approved for covid19, has been approved by FDA for other shit for decades. OP said it got approved in 24 hours for covid19. This is an example of "right to try" which is great.
EDIT: you didn't read the article did you?
"So, Giardinieri reached out to an infectious disease doctor. “He gave me all the reasons why I would probably not want to try it because there are no trials, there’s no testing, it was not something that was approved."
Just stop. You’re just obsessively harping on his words. The very definition of Trump TDSIt's literally not approved for covid19, has been approved by FDA for other shit for decades. OP said it got approved in 24 hours for covid19. This is an example of "right to try" which is great.
EDIT: you didn't read the article did you?
"So, Giardinieri reached out to an infectious disease doctor. “He gave me all the reasons why I would probably not want to try it because there are no trials, there’s no testing, it was not something that was approved."
It's literally not approved for covid19, has been approved by FDA for other shit for decades. OP said it got approved in 24 hours for covid19. This is an example of "right to try" which is great.
EDIT: you didn't read the article did you?
"So, Giardinieri reached out to an infectious disease doctor. “He gave me all the reasons why I would probably not want to try it because there are no trials, there’s no testing, it was not something that was approved."
100%. I mean there's no doubt in my mind I'd be asking for this if I had a loved one on the verge of death but I wouldn't be looking to it on day 1 until it's tested more. The reality is that 99% of people will make it through C19 without treatment and this treatment, if applied wildly, would have a greater than 1% side effect rate. It might be that in advanced cases it's not as effective if done as soon as symptoms begin. There is no data on this and that's why doctors are skeptical. Not that it won't be a great too but there are too many unknowns for this to be a first line of defense. Staying home remains the only reliable weapon we have.I'm willing to bet that he won't hesitate to use it next time. Just as long as the patient is informed about the side effects and that it isn't an approved treatment for covid, theres no liability on his part.