Save your energy, Ucfmikes. Arguing with pro-Putin morons is a colossal waste of your time.
Russian invasion into Ukraine is imminent
- Thread starter Crazyhole
- Start date
Maybe instead of giving money to Ukraine, we contract oil producers to expedite drilling, expand refining capacity, and produce more fertilizer. Choke off Putins honeypot by flooding the market with the commodities that he's getting rich off of.
It seems rather elementary. Immediate approval of oil leases with financial incentives to increase supply. Add government backed projects on federal lands for a higher royalty kick backs to taxpayers. Guarantee oil companies an incentive to over supply the market. For the environmentalists use the royalties for energy efficiency programs.
On one hand we are giving away billions a week to an endless proxy war. Then the war is enriching Russia from increased oil prices while making us have run away inflation because we won't fill the energy gap.
We still have about 4 million barrels per day of unused capacity in refining, and also a depleted strategic reserve. There's no reason that we shouldn't focus on upping our oil extraction right now, even if that means we have to subsidize a few oil producers.
Definitely cheaper to subsidize oil producers and choke out the putin war machine vs just doing nothing and handing over $50 billion per month to ukraine to an endless war. Just maybe oversupplying oil can tame inflation too which was self inflected in the first place.
And you think this is going to be accomplished in a few weeks or a a few months? That still might not change anything in regards to India and China buying oil cheaply. If we don’t support Ukraine at all, then they will basically overrun Ukraine quickly and we still are going to spend more money supporting the next country they set their sights on
If you can drop the price of oil below Russia's production cost, you cut their revenue stream. Yes, I think we could accomplish it in the matter of a few months, but more importantly the traders that actually set the price would lower their bids so it would have an immediate effect.
Look, we know that Russia will eventually take whatever part of Ukraine they want. Then, if they choose to move on they will take the next country. Either we engage them militarily or we find a way to actually impoverish them.
Disclose TV is a chud, unreliable Twitter site. Nobody is clicking on that crap
I agree, never rely on 1 source... In this case, I've seen a few articles on the matter:
Russia lowers gas flows to Europe with part stuck in Canada
Russian state-controlled energy giant Gazprom says gas deliveries through a key pipeline to Europe will drop by around 40% this year.
apnews.com
Disclose is just an aggregator of news stories from sources like the AP, Reuters, ABC, etc. I have yet to come across one of their reports that wasn't true.I agree, never rely on 1 source... In this case, I've seen a few articles on the matter:
Russia lowers gas flows to Europe with part stuck in Canada
Russian state-controlled energy giant Gazprom says gas deliveries through a key pipeline to Europe will drop by around 40% this year.
Disclose.TV: English disinformation made in Germany – DW – 02/08/2022
Disclose.TV uses grains of truth and English content to mask the way it operates, delivering far-right and conspiracy content to its millions of followers.
amp.dw.com
Correction, Ucfmikes. nobody is clinking on that crap who is interested in reality.
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: Germany (13/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Media Bias/Fact Check News
We are the most comprehensive media bias resource on the internet. There are currently 3900+ media sources listed in our database and growing every day.
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Disclose.TV: English disinformation made in Germany – DW – 02/08/2022
Disclose.TV uses grains of truth and English content to mask the way it operates, delivering far-right and conspiracy content to its millions of followers.
And then you link amp.dw.com
Brilliance
It figures that our resident, racist, conspiracy theorist uses that as his goto for disinformation. However, @UCFBS just makes things up and posts them as fact. Or, he’ll cite his own Twitter account as a source 😂Correction, Ucfmikes. nobody is clinking on that crap who is interested in reality.
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: Germany (13/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Media Bias/Fact Check News
We are the most comprehensive media bias resource on the internet. There are currently 3900+ media sources listed in our database and growing every day.
The cesspool at its finest 😊
Correction, Ucfmikes. nobody is clinking on that crap who is interested in reality.
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: Germany (13/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Media Bias/Fact Check News
We are the most comprehensive media bias resource on the internet. There are currently 3900+ media sources listed in our database and growing every day.
And for clown #2
Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest? - Just Facts
“Media Bias Fact Check,” a media outlet that claims to be “dedicated to educating the public on media bias and deceptive news practices,” is either inept or dishonest.
www.justfactsdaily.com
How many more links would you like @KNIGHTTIME^ ? It’s a chud sight. Igor Chudov doesn’t even use it
Disclose.tv: Conspiracy Forum Turned Disinformation Factory
Disclose.tv, though it presents itself as a news aggregator, promotes pseudoscientific conspiracy theories on its social media without accountabillity.
www.logically.ai
It's a news aggregation service. While they mostly post articles that are negative towards liberals doesn't make them untrue. I'm sure we can find news aggregation services that will only report negative articles to conservatives. Doesn't make either fake or untrue.
A 'disinformation' factory??!? SAY IT AIN'T SO, Ucfmikes!!!!!
Never heard of it... Sounds similar to what Drudge Report was.
Now I don't believe or read just 1 source for politically charged topics... I'll go through 5-6 sources to get different perspectives with eyes wide open to the political leanings of each company and "journalist" - which I now consider all to be "opinion columnists".
Do you make your sandwiches at Wawa in aggregate or do you put the whole thing together yourself?
Sounds like it may be a "selective" information aggregation site, similar to drudge, picking/choosing more Republican-favored stories and conveniently leaving out the rest...A 'disinformation' factory??!? SAY IT AIN'T SO, Ucfmikes!!!!!
Even primary news agencies do it... Just head over to MSNBC's website... do a word search for "economy" or "inflation" ...you will find no reference to either on the page (as of 12:45pm there were 0 results)... It doesn't favor democrats... Hell, "Biden" is only found once.
Then do a word search on Jan 6. and Trump, then whoa! ...we know where their focus is.
So I've all but given up on 1 stop "news" organizations...we all should, else they have uncontrolled influence on all of us.
#BeIndependent
Wait? Wut? That would actually take time. Surely our resident unemployed imbeciles don’t have THAT 🤷♂️😊
ITT the link I provided was corroborated by the AP, moron.Correction, Ucfmikes. nobody is clinking on that crap who is interested in reality.
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: Germany (13/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Media Bias/Fact Check News
We are the most comprehensive media bias resource on the internet. There are currently 3900+ media sources listed in our database and growing every day.
How is a story about Russia cutting gas transport based on not having a pump that Canada won't allow to be returned pro anyone? If anything, it's pro-Ukraine.
Biden administration announces additional $1 billion in military aid for Ukraine | CNN Politics
The Biden administration announced on Wednesday it was providing an additional $1 billion in military aid to Ukraine to fight Russia, a package that includes shipments of additional howitzers, ammunition and coastal defense systems.
Only another billion dollars? Surely we can do better than that.
It’s 50 billion a day like @KNIGHTTIME^ saidBiden administration announces additional $1 billion in military aid for Ukraine | CNN Politics
The Biden administration announced on Wednesday it was providing an additional $1 billion in military aid to Ukraine to fight Russia, a package that includes shipments of additional howitzers, ammunition and coastal defense systems.edition.cnn.com
Only another billion dollars? Surely we can do better than that.
So now you link a company that just another aggregation source which they claim is "ai" but not....anyway aggregating data from "fact checkers" which historically are not impartial.
Keep trying
Not sure who she is but the $50 billion a month comment was a bit of sarcasm but we don't know the exact actual numbers.
Last month we were already over $50 billion not counting the already purchased equipment given to ukraine. At the rate of spending with the endless war, we will spend a trillion on a proxy war. So either just negotiate with Russia or lose a trillion with nothing in return.
Scorecard
1) ruble gaining value
2) russia gaining land in Ukraine
3) record surplus in Russia from oil
Four Ways to Understand the $54 Billion in U.S. Spending on Ukraine (Published 2022)
It’s the most annual assistance given by the U.S. to a country in the last decade.
YIKES! Looks like those 'historically impartial' fact-checkers who describe the site as a low-fact dive that caters to the internet's Conspiracy-Pseudoscience nutjobs hit a nerve.
We only listen to reputable sources. Big swing and a miss. Not sure who you 2 lovers are trying to impress, but nobody is even reading your BDS-driven nonsenseNot sure who she is but the $50 billion a month comment was a bit of sarcasm but we don't know the exact actual numbers.
Last month we were already over $50 billion not counting the already purchased equipment given to ukraine. At the rate of spending with the endless war, we will spend a trillion on a proxy war. So either just negotiate with Russia or lose a trillion with nothing in return.
Scorecard
1) ruble gaining value
2) russia gaining land in Ukraine
3) record surplus in Russia from oil
Four Ways to Understand the $54 Billion in U.S. Spending on Ukraine (Published 2022)
It’s the most annual assistance given by the U.S. to a country in the last decade.www.nytimes.com
