Fair enough. I don't think all the facts are out on either of the Ukraine interactions. Such as, it is now coming out that the complaint from the whistleblower asserts that the whistleblower did not have firsthand knowledge of the conversation between Trump and Zelensky. If that's the case, then the whistleblower did not listen in on the conversation and all the rest is suspect as well. IOW, we don't have any facts about Trump and we have a Biden embellished story on Biden.
Lol, impeachment proceedings starting in 3..2..1
Actually, that doesn't matter. Democrats have been saying that about Trump on so many things as well -- from Cambridge to Cohen. This is the hypocrisy that is alienating moderates and classic liberals.
And that doesn't matter either. The fact of the matter is that there were questionable realities and the prospect had been visited. It makes for a conflict-of-interest. Again, hypocrisy is rearing it's ugly head.
And you don't, let alone the US Media and Democrats do not, stretch the facts even farther than this on Trump? Seriously?! That's your 'explanation'?
You requesting objectivity from the media, right? Do you have any requests for the truth from Trump?
If anything comes of it??? Something will definitely come of it. But given our Senate, he's likely to survive this stupid play too.
LOL A made-up abuse-of-power to excuse the real thing. 85 is a comedic gift that keeps on giving.
The country doesn't give 2 shits about The Constitution??!?
Are you saying Biden made up his abuse of power story? Because if he didn’t, then he confessed to exactly what you all are thinking that Trump did based upon some secondhand account turned into a whistleblower complaint.LOL A made-up abuse-of-power to excuse the real thing. 85 is a comedic gift that keeps on giving.
The country doesn't give 2 shits about The Constitution??!?
Jeez, I could have sworn you were apoplectic about Obama's 'abuses of power' but Trump uses his position and the resources of the USA to intimidate the new leader of the Ukraine, and suddenly nobody "gives 2 shits???"
But don't listen to me 'cause I'm just a "raging hypocrite," right?
No, we just want you to treat the situations the same. You want to impeach Trump but totally ignore that the same inappropriate leverage should disqualify Biden from the Presidency. Get them both or leave them both alone.
You think that is the case. But the guy had investigated Burisma, Hunter was working for Burisma, and that is a clear conflict of interest with Joe Biden. At the very least, he should’ve recused himself. Saying nothing about the fact that Hunter was hired by Burisma a month after Biden visits Kiev the first time. All of that stinks to high heaven.
Think about it: If YOU felt compelled to defend Trump's shenanigans, what do you say for crying out loud???
He flat out admitted to leveraging a billion dollars to force a firing. If that’s not inappropriate, then why the hell are you railing on about Trump?
You do realize that the Biden family dealings in Ukraine stink of corruption and asking Ukraine to investigate that corruption is what is happening, right? If asking to investigate corruption is ok, then you should be ok.
Read the following response very carefully, sk8:
So again, Biden admitted to threatening to withhold money to force an action to investigate corruption. Given your own standard, can you admit that this is a problem?
Using the power of your office to secure a job for someone that they are not remotely qualified for is unethical. Whoever is doing it.
