I know this isnt how you meant it but, exactly. No one died. They were protesting haircuts and fishing.
In his mind you wanted republicans killed. Its insane but since thats how his brain works he thinks thats how everyone else also thinks.
It is amazing how semantic you get when your own meanings are called out. So let's do that. You say "storming state capitals." Storming is what happened to the police station in MN before it was burnt to the ground. Storming is used to describe military offensive actions. It has a violent connotation. None of those protests were violent, though, so you are mis-characterizing the event for your own narrative.
Dude, there have been loads of videos that clearly show cops being aggressive. It isnt all cops, but it isnt just a tiny few either. I dont know what else to tell ya.
And most of those are edited to omit anything other than the cop being aggressive. Do you think that there are valid situations where cops can be aggressive?
I'm the poster who said, 'good ole boys' and yes, I am implying institutional racism.
So then enlighten me, why did you decide to compare the two events? What was your intention there?
Good Grief. I'm not the one who described a peaceful Black protest as a publicity stunt.
I'm not saying the response would've been the same, it most likely wouldn't. I'm saying that the police in cities largely know who is going to be at a protest and know the history of their actions. Given that, there are far more reasons for responses to be different than racism.
Yeah. At least he'd have a tough row to hoe to convert this to a police state. He'd have to get legislation passed that makes it legal to conduct intelligence operations on Americans on our own soil, then he'd have to construct a secret court to get past the due process concerns, then he'd have to engage the domestic and foreign intelligence agencies to conduct operations on Americans domestic and abroad, and then put trusted people in the right places and seed the judiciary to make sure that no one ever pays the price for abusing the system. There's no way any President or even combination of President's such as W, Obama, and Trump could ever put this into place so we should be safe.
Bingo. Also in before someone states that class warfare is race-based.
Ah, so there were far more reasons for the tough response than racism? Ooooookay, believe what you want to believe.
Stealing a cheesecake from cheesecake factory is not the same as cutting peoples heads off. Hope this clears up the confusion.
if u are talking about the incident in Austin that was InfoWars chuds so anything they report shouldn’t be trusted
Yeah I think that's what I'm talking about, but didnt realize infowars was involved.
This must be bullshit because @sk8knight posted a link to the City Medical Examiner's report which emphatically stated there was NO physical evidence to support asphyxiation. (So no second-degree murder)
I have no problem revising my opinion based on new evidence. I’d like to see how each reached their conclusions but Baden is an expert so should get some respect. With directly conflicting reports, how do we get to the truth? Also, it’ll be interesting how this effects proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is still the law in this country.
Oh I dunno, maybe a third report from an unbiased third party?
Yes it it the law of the land. The jury will see the same incriminating video evidence that half the world has already seen.
