Don't you dare question the revised history, fried! The boys were simply 'standing their ground' in the face of this Native American aggressor by golly!!!!!
Can we all agree on this story?
- Thread starter DaShuckster
- Start date
Don't you dare question the revised history, fried! The boys were simply 'standing their ground' in the face of this Native American aggressor by golly!!!!!
Don't you dare question the revised history, fried! The boys were simply 'standing their ground' in the face of this Native American aggressor by golly!!!!!
You can't simply admit you bought into the propaganda. It's really ok to be wrong.
Funny how this "propaganda" thing works. The boys were caught being disrespectful but once we added a couple Black guys throwing some MAGA insults AT THEM, well, then, by golly, CLEARLY they were actually the innocent victims, right Husk???
Am I defending the insults thrown at them? Hell no. But were they disrespectful to the Native American man and the young woman they came into contact that day? Absolutely.
One smirk is worth a thousand empty words, Joey.
Lock all those teenage boys up in a federal penitentiary. Smirking is a got damn felony.
The black hebrews were doing much more than throwing insults. They were inciting violence against bystanders
Yes, BUT THE TEENAGE BOYS SMIRKED.
It’s telling that this is more upsetting to low-IQ Der shookster.
Careful there, Joey. Remember those boys were all innocently standing their ground against that aggressive Native American.
We all just misinterpreted their smirks.
No one is going to explain to me why all the sudden these future incels are the victims now? I can't find any posts in here or articles to explain this massive shift
A tape surfaced of a couple of BLACK DUDES INSULTING THEM. Does anything MORE need to be said?!?!
What does that have to do with anything?A tape surfaced of a couple of BLACK DUDES INSULTING THEM. Does anything MORE need to be said?!?!
Clearly it means they were actually innocent victims who deserve a trip to the White House.
Awww, my little toadie troll has stopped by with another stellar contribution to the discussion.
Attaboy, 85. How in the world could we survive without your 'high IQ' gems?
Watch the full video. The confrontation was between the Black Hebrews and the Indians. When the Indians began to escalate it, the Black Hebrews incited the confrontation towards the Covington kids who at that point werent doing anything.Clearly it means they were actually innocent victims who deserve a trip to the White House.
The only video I saw was the Indian dude beating a drum which seemed to cause the red hat incels to froth up like 85 does in every thread.
It's because you're an idiot who deals in willful ignorance, like your bud @DaShuckster . I guess you guys have been pushing fake news stories so hard lately that you figure "why not continue believing this one too?"
I feel bad for these kids, knowing this country has people like you two, who will continue believing your own little fake news narrative even if it means nutbag lefties keep harassing them for something they didn't do.
That's the problem. The 30 minute long video shows you what happened leading up to that point.
Do you honestly think chicken or shookster give a flying fukc what happened leading up to it? They don’t and I doubt they’ve bothered to watch the footage. You have dumb ass shookster who is still outraged at the smirking kid and wants him arrested. It’s pretty sad how we are now here a month later and these idiots still won’t admit they are wrong.
Can you save me 30 min and describe what the native American dude did to the virgins? I've asked like 5 times it must not be that compelling or the red hats ITT would be giddy to share.
I've not taken a stance on this one way or another. I haven't posted in this thread except to try to understand why, after not checking this thread for a week, all the sudden this Native American Is considered the aggressor. Im not going to watch a half an hour video surely someone can just describe what he did to the innocent virgin boys.
I'm assuming these Catholic high schoolers are true to their faith. Is that an issue?
I just read an article on fox news. I'm not going to spend 30 min watching a video of this. I was thinking surely Fox will give me a red hat version of the story so I can under stand why the native American was surrounded by teen virgins doing the tomahawk chop in his face.
Here's what they said.
Sandmann and other Covington Catholic students were accused of initiating the altercation and intimidating Phillips but other videos showed that the students were verbally accosted by a group of black street preachers who were shouting insults both at them and a group of Native Americans.
What the shit do black street preachers insulting everyone have to do with surrounding an old man and mocking his heritage?
If anyone has a better description of events I'm glad to read it but I doubt you do. You'd have been giddy to explain to me why the media is fake news shills or whatever y'all are always going on about.
Here's what they said.
Sandmann and other Covington Catholic students were accused of initiating the altercation and intimidating Phillips but other videos showed that the students were verbally accosted by a group of black street preachers who were shouting insults both at them and a group of Native Americans.
What the shit do black street preachers insulting everyone have to do with surrounding an old man and mocking his heritage?
If anyone has a better description of events I'm glad to read it but I doubt you do. You'd have been giddy to explain to me why the media is fake news shills or whatever y'all are always going on about.
Actually I did see that part and that's not true. He walked about 20 feet away from them and within 10 seconds of the clip he was surrounded as they moved around him.
It's my fault really. I should have been in this thread to stop the red hats from gaslighting each other that somehow a group of black preachers hurling insults caused this unrelated native American to be the aggressor.
You guys for 3 or 4 pages just went on and on about how the media lied but when asked repeatedly to share what the lie was you just referred me to a 30 min video that none of you had watched it seems.
This dude didn't plow into the group of kids, he got surrounded because they moved around him.
I see nothing provided to change the initial argument that they were wrong to surround a Native American and mock his culture.
You guys for 3 or 4 pages just went on and on about how the media lied but when asked repeatedly to share what the lie was you just referred me to a 30 min video that none of you had watched it seems.
This dude didn't plow into the group of kids, he got surrounded because they moved around him.
I see nothing provided to change the initial argument that they were wrong to surround a Native American and mock his culture.
Exactly correct. If you see the whole section with the drummer, you can even see the smirkee,, turn to other students telling them not to react to him.
The 4 or 5 kids that acted out with the girl earlier were wrong, but that had 0 to do with what happened later during this incident. This was a case of grown adults being the spoiled brat kids, and the kids acting like the adults.
Good point! It's not like this issue is about character or anything.
Bizarre. All it took was for a couple of insults caught on tape from two Black guys for these spoiled brat kids to be considered by anyone to have behaved as "mature adults."
That's the only way one can logically explain how such an obvious, 'in-your-face' smirk could be morphed into the face of an innocent "hero" worthy of a White House invite.
It makes no sense that the Black Hebrews insulting everyone somehow transformed the Native American into an aggressor. The red hats know this.
Some of them did act immaturely but they were actually trying to side with the indians. If not for the one guy doing his shtick this would look a whole lot different. The rest of the indians weren't doing anything provocative towards the kids, while the Black Hebrews were all spewing violent rhetoric. Just watch the whole video and it makes more sense.
The right wing bloggers had a field day trashing this old man after the incident. The whole idea behind it was to paint him as the aggressor.
So what does that have to do with the "watch the whole video!" argument? Are we just abandoning that and switching to the Native American is a political troll?
