Oh, you’re a Ben Shapiro listener!
The issue originally was such a big problem because Trump allegedly leveraged contracts to pressure Ukraine into compliance. Since there was no pressure, you’re just going to go on like your narrative wasn’t ruined.Oh, you’re a Ben Shapiro listener!
We have Trump admitting he asked the Ukrainian President to pursue an investigation of his political rival. We also have a tape of Trump saying it’s too bad the whistleblower can’t be treated like the way we treated spies ‘back in the old days’ when we were smart.
Gee, I wonder if these actions are an abuse of power???!? Naaaaaaaw, this is just a “witch hunt”, right guys?
Oh, you’re a Ben Shapiro listener!
We have Trump admitting he asked the Ukrainian President to pursue an investigation of his political rival. We also have a tape of Trump saying it’s too bad the whistleblower can’t be treated like the way we treated spies ‘back in the old days’ when we were smart.
Gee, I wonder if these actions are an abuse of power???!? Naaaaaaaw, this is just a “witch hunt”, right guys?
. OOOOH! This is really about LANGUAGE now! The excuses keep getting funnier and funnier!
A “well documented fact”...or you parroting a Shapiro rant you heard?
. OOOOH! This is really about LANGUAGE now! The excuses keep getting funnier and funnier!
A “well documented fact”...or you parroting a Shapiro rant you heard?
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
Just look at this. NPR totally cut out over 500 words between these sections in the transcript to paint the impression that they were tied together when they weren’t. They’re all in on painting a fake news narrative for the Democrats
Then there’s this that ABC ran with despite it being utterly fake and invented fact
They ask this guy about being falsely implicated in the story and he starts telling them what he's read about himself in these fake media reports
Hey remind me again why the republicans impeached Clinton.
You're exactly right. Because it's against the law to do one and it's following the law to do the other.
If Trump believes the Bidens committed a crime the correct organization to ask to investigate would be our department of justice. You see, it is illegal to solicit political assistance from a foreign government and that's what Trump did. It is not illegal for the DOJ to investigate a suspected criminal if there is sufficient evidence to suspect a crime has taken place.
same exact reason the dems are trying to impeach trump today. the reps back there were as delusional as the dems are today. they are both filled with hate. the reps were wrong then and the dems are wrong today.
The DoJ completely put the shackles on the FBI's investigation. There was an absolutely partisan angle to that!
With as strong of a fanboy of HRC as Comey has admitted to being and how political he has been since he’s been fired, you can’t honestly say the HRC investigation wasn’t partisan. It’s water under the bridge now though, so other than absolute frustration from those of us who have to live by the actual cleared information laws, it doesn’t make any difference now.
Comey said he did it to get it out of the way of the election so that there were no clouds over HRC’s head. Not because he was some paragon of virtue. That guy was as partisan as it got.
Sigh ... The DoJ did! When are you going to get that through your skull?! It was the DoJ!
Not buying it, anyone paying attention knows full well the left will not nominate Joe Biden.
And I'm sure he did. Just like Obama did. The question is ... how much is the US Media going to keep saying Obama was right, Trump was wrong, and the American people are going to believe it?
And he cleared her 3 days before the election.
He explicitly said that he didn’t want her Presidency tainted by the spectre of an ongoing FBI investigation. He absolutely did that to help her. As he did when he usurped DOJ authority by publicly claiming that there was nothing to prosecute because, even though the law doesn’t require an expression of intent, he didn’t find any intent in Hillary’s actions.
Yep. He'd feel irresponsible in not offering that up. And based on the evidence -- completely restricted by the DOJ-Clinton agreement, so the FBI received only a minor subset of what should have been investigated -- he had to clear her.
Sure. But he wasn’t operating as if politics weren’t a factor in his actions and duties.
Of course Comey had to consider that. But Comey was about as neutral as I've ever seen anyone ... especially considering the clear partisan actions of his boss at the DOJ. Unfortunately for the FBI, the DOJ agreed with Clinton lawyers and completely shackled the FBI. So the evidence they had was completely limited. That's why Comey re-opened the investigation when they found the added notebook. And he closed it again when he realized there was little on it.
We have already established that the DOJ can't hold the president accountable for committing crimes. Since I'm assuming you don't think the president is above the law you must believe that Congress is the correct path for when the president commits crimes.
The Core of Trump's 2016 base voted for the guy as a 'giant middle-finger' to our Federal government. So his crazyass antics elicit gleeful 'Attaboy Trump' rebel yells from them. It's obvious they don't give a sh*t.
