ADVERTISEMENT

Republican Senate Nominee Next To Fall

Y'all are pretty funny though, just wondering when the FNB or 85 list of insults will be showing up? You two wouldn't possibly let your political affiliations determine calling people out, would you?

Honestly, I think that you're an arrogant, condescending, self-righteous ass - even worse than Chemmie. I'm not one to typically go around insulting people or calling them names but you're absolutely horrible. You can't have a simple conversation without insulting someone indirectly or directly. I haven't seen anything you've said on this board to tell me you're a good dude.

As far as 85 is concerned, he doesn't seem to be that nice a guy either but you take it up two-fold. I've called him an ass in the past also.

I've met Bob and I've had drinks with him on several occasions tailgating and he's a nice guy. He doesn't insult people on this board unless it's done to him first and it typically takes several times.

BT is doesn't insult people unless they've been flaming a-holes. I've met him on several occasions and he is one of the nicest, most respectful, level headed guys you'll ever meet. You could learn a lot from him.

MAC is decent most of the time and I typically don't have a problem with the way he interacts with people on here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UCFBS and UCFWayne
Honestly, I think that you're an arrogant, condescending, self-righteous ass - even worse than Chemmie. I'm not one to typically go around insulting people or calling them names but you're absolutely horrible. You can't have a simple conversation without insulting someone indirectly or directly. I haven't seen anything you've said on this board to tell me you're a good dude.

As far as 85 is concerned, he doesn't seem to be that nice a guy either but you take it up two-fold. I've called him an ass in the past also.

I've met Bob and I've had drinks with him on several occasions tailgating and he's a nice guy. He doesn't insult people on this board unless it's done to him first and it typically takes several times.

MAC is decent most of the time and I typically don't have a problem with the way he interacts with people on here.
I’m not important enough for a review I guess :-(
 
Honestly, I think that you're an arrogant, condescending, self-righteous ass - even worse than Chemmie. I'm not one to typically go around insulting people or calling them names but you're absolutely horrible. You can't have a simple conversation without insulting someone indirectly or directly. I haven't seen anything you've said on this board to tell me you're a good dude.

As far as 85 is concerned, he doesn't seem to be that nice a guy either but you take it up two-fold. I've called him an ass in the past also.

I've met Bob and I've had drinks with him on several occasions tailgating and he's a nice guy. He doesn't insult people on this board unless it's done to him first and it typically takes several times.

BT is doesn't insult people unless they've been flaming a-holes. I've met him on several occasions and he is one of the nicest, most respectful, level headed guys you'll ever meet. You could learn a lot from him.

MAC is decent most of the time and I typically don't have a problem with the way he interacts with people on here.

Yes, but am I ever wrong?
 
I'm still just sitting here waiting for 85 to talk about how terrible all things that Moore did. He's been in every other sexual deviants thread telling us what a terrible person they are and how horrible it must be for the victims. I know for a fact that it he sees me mention his name he would have posted. Why doesn't he care about the little girls Moore raped?
 
@UCFKnight85 is a precious snowflake. He likely ran off to his safe space and blocked you. He couldn't take any more criticism. Just like when he ran off after getting tired of me pointing out every time, and there are many, that he is wrong. He is still very upset that he never made his father proud, so he gets even more upset when we ridicule him too.
 
Lol I don't think he can see your tag since he went full snowflake on you. Besides I want him to show up on his own to tell us what a disgusting individual Moore is, just like he has done multiple times in every other sexual weirdo thread
 
Still waiting on 85 to even open this thread. He's since posted yet another sexual harassment thread, with multiple posts within those threads that he has started detailing the acts. Surely he cares about seeing all sexual perverts brought to justice and not just those who he hates?
 
Still waiting on 85 to even open this thread. He's since posted yet another sexual harassment thread, with multiple posts within those threads that he has started detailing the acts. Surely he cares about seeing all sexual perverts brought to justice and not just those who he hates?

Maybe he put you on ignore?
 
Lol nope he just quoted me in the other thread.

He doesn't give a flying shit about these victims unless it makes his political side look good. Truly pathetic.

Agreed. Idgaf who it is: anyone who acts like a sexual predator should be excoriated to the highest degree.

Now he’ll probably come in here and say something like “awwww look at the circle jerk beteeen you two. How cute.” You know, anything but talk about the trashy gunslinging pedophile republican.
 
Agreed. Idgaf who it is: anyone who acts like a sexual predator should be excoriated to the highest degree.

Now he’ll probably come in here and say something like “awwww look at the circle jerk beteeen you two. How cute.” You know, anything but talk about the trashy gunslinging pedophile republican.

That's the thing, I really don't think he will ever even click on this thread. It makes his "side" look bad, so to him the only acceptable tactic is to stick his head in the sand and pretend like it never existed, and then continue searching every corner of the internet for dirt on left wing people.

It's disingenuous at best and pathetic at worst.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MACHater02
Day 2. Still no sign of 85 or his righteous indignation in here. I fear we might never see him visit this thread, it seems all of his outrage is reserved only for liberal sexual offenders.
 
#reallysuperduperobsessed

I'll spell it out for you with crayons as I always seem to have to do. 85 cannot resist replying to me if he sees me mention his name: by continually posting his name I'm proving that he is a piece of shit hypocrite who delights in liberals raping people but does not give a shit about little girls raped by republicans, they are an inconvenience to his agenda.

Try to keep up next time.
 
At least I won't have to worry about 85 showing up in this thread to complete your little high school gossip girl clique, he doesn't give a fuk about people sexually assaulted by Republicans.
That is were you are mistaken, when republican perverts are involved it isn't sexual assault. It is normal behavior that the liberal media misconstrued
 
  • Like
Reactions: MACHater02
A supporting actor from a 70s tv show and a shitty stand up comic are much more important than a Senate nominee and our President!
 
A supporting actor from a 70s tv show and a shitty stand up comic are much more important than a Senate nominee and our President!

I never agree with chemmie but he is 100% spot on.

Dems should be ashamed they elected a rapist twice and then tried twice to put his enabling wife that covered up for him and slut shamed his victims in office too!
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
A supporting actor from a 70s tv show and a shitty stand up comic are much more important than a Senate nominee and our President!

I never agree with chemmie but he is 100% spot on.

Dems should be ashamed they elected a rapist twice and then tried twice to put his enabling wife that covered up for him and slut shamed his victims in office too!
FAKENEWS!!!!!!!!!
 
Day 3 or 4. Beginning to lose track of time. 85 still has not even clicked this thread, yet he posts in the other sexual harassment threads hourly.
 
God fearing Christian and Republican Senate nominee, Roy Moore, is a pervert. 4 woman have already come forward saying he had sexual conduct with them while they were under the age of 18.

Sick asshole.

Who is next?

The Republican Party is full of absolute degenerates and now the dam wall is failing on all of these secrets.
Ummm, if you're going to list politicians who had sexual relations with those under 18, you're going to catch a lot of Democratic candidates as well.

That, and it's Alabama. There are modern parts of Alabama ... and there are not-so-modern.

Also remember Arkansas has the same problem. You should know at least one other politician from that state of similar attitudes. Again, these guys are all sick.

It's not just one party, although plenty in both parties make excuses for them.
 
Yes, but am I ever wrong?
Yes. All the time.
Ummm, I've caught you in several too Ninja. That's why I end up giving you a lot of flak. You literally get caught and won't own up to it, but move the goal posts and change the subject.

When I've been wrong before, I own up to it. You really display a lot of textbook mainstream media progressive logic, and with impunity. One of my major pet peeves are people who do that.

I think my favorite was your defense of a rapper with how much charity he does, instead of focusing on the issues with the rapper. You couldn't get any more textbook than that.
 
Ummm, I've caught you in several too Ninja. That's why I end up giving you a lot of flak. You literally get caught and won't own up to it, but move the goal posts and change the subject.

When I've been wrong before, I own up to it. You really display a lot of textbook mainstream media progressive logic, and with impunity. One of my major pet peeves are people who do that.

I think my favorite was your defense of a rapper with how much charity he does, instead of focusing on the issues with the rapper. You couldn't get any more textbook than that.


Post the quote that was wrong.
 
Post the quote that was wrong.
No. Because you will just side-step it just like you do in those threads. I might be annoying, and mash people's faces in their mistakes (when they expense the program), but at least I have some integrity.
 
No. Because you will just side-step it just like you do in those threads. I might be annoying, and mash people's faces in their mistakes (when they expense the program), but at least I have some integrity.

I'll do it for you. I'm sorry you can't comprehend a simple statement that I was pointing out Snoop did in fact donate a lot to charity, when racist.knight said "I don't see the Snoop Dogg institute for inner city children".
 
So far we've had 2 people claim to have corrected me on something I have posted, and yet strangely no one can produce any proof. How incredibly convenient.

the-bullshit-flag-has-been-raised-and-boy-is-it-10999782.png
 
So far we've had 2 people claim to have corrected me on something I have posted, and yet strangely no one can produce any proof. How incredibly convenient.

the-bullshit-flag-has-been-raised-and-boy-is-it-10999782.png
We're idiots and you're always right. So why care?
 
We're idiots and you're always right. So why care?

I just enjoy throwing it in your faces to break up the Breitbart circle jerk that some people try to turn this place into, what was once an enjoyable forum.

Plus it's funny.
 
I just enjoy throwing it in your faces to break up the Breitbart circle jerk that some people try to turn this place into, what was once an enjoyable forum.
Since when do my responses sound like a single Breibart-like article?!

You, on the other hand, pull comments right out of the Mainstream, Progressive, Media. Again, my personal, all-time, favorite ...
Why is it that the biggest goddamned snowflakes are always the people who complain the most about PC culture and people being offended?
Simple, it's a double standard and hypocrisy in action. And when you do not agree, you too look like yet another Progressive that enjoys that double standard too.

Now we Libertarians say you Progressives have that right. But we can also agree the Conservatives are spot-on when they call you hypocrites too.

Oh and a 5 second Google search showed that Snoop supports the following charities:
Classic Clinton-Progressive move.

Deflect a valid criticism by charging they do good for society, and should be excused. The President of NOW did that for Bill. Various celebrites did that for Harvey. Just write a check to Planned Parenthood and you too can be excused, especially compared to those abusive husband's of flyover territory.

Ninja, man, this right here is why Donald Trump won. It's exact sets of statements like yours that have such a false narrative to them. Even people who voted Trump and now regret it, look at people like yourself and go, "I didn't really want Trump, but I didn't want that attitude (yours) in my leadership far more."

As the OP asked ...

"Can you imagine an album cover with Obama on a slab and the klan standing over him?"
Can you even paraphrase -- not even have to quote, but just paraphrase -- an answer of mine that sounds like it came out of Breibart?!

I fully admit I sound like Reason.COM at times, even Rand-like studies, among other, Libertarian sources. If you want to make fun of me for those, go right ahead, they fit.

But Breibart?! Seriously?!

You may claim not to be a Progressive, but you are flat out textbook Mainstream, Progressive Media. I, at least, call out both sides. It just happens to be your answers are almost always throwing mud -- hypocritically -- at the right.

I my book, the only thing Breibart does right is give a Conservative Gay an outlet that no one else would give him.
 
I was not referring to you when I said "some people".

You'll notice I haven't really called you out on bullshit since you haven't posted any, except your obviously wrong post on the legality of full automatic weapons.
 
A fifth woman has now come out and said she was also sexually abused by Moore as a teenager.

I get the feeling even more are yet to come.
 
I can testify that things were very different 40 years ago - not that it excuses anybody for inappropriate behavior. But...

Back then the definition of sexual harassment was way different than today. Was dating someone 20 years younger than you considered weird - yes, but not a crime.

Back then we would cruise the streets, honking and waving to girls - and they’d smile and wave back. You can’t do that today.

My point is that given all of the accusations over the past year among all industries - and not excusing true sexual harassment or assault - perspectives have changed.

Just like the whole statue controversy, it’s problematic to project today’s mores upon the past, And to politicize those different mores is also problematic, too
 
I can testify that things were very different 40 years ago - not that it excuses anybody for inappropriate behavior. But...

Back then the definition of sexual harassment was way different than today. Was dating someone 20 years younger than you considered weird - yes, but not a crime.

Back then we would cruise the streets, honking and waving to girls - and they’d smile and wave back. You can’t do that today.

My point is that given all of the accusations over the past year among all industries - and not excusing true sexual harassment or assault - perspectives have changed.

Just like the whole statue controversy, it’s problematic to project today’s mores upon the past, And to politicize those different mores is also problematic, too

While I understand the sentiment behind this post for example the cat-calling and behavior of that sort, I have a hard time believing it was ever ok for 30 year old man to feel up 14 year old girls.

My grandfather would have killed any man who did the stuff Moore is being accused of if had happened to my mother and he knew about it, even 40 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
still no 85. Guess a gay Trek star is more important than a potential Senator. 85 is probably chocking on Hannity's cock right now and can't come up for air.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT