I’m not sure what you mean by “the handling”. If you are using an appeal to authority as the basis for arguing for or against a certain action you are always going to run into trouble of contradicting guidance. There are multiple “authorities” and early on there was not much known about the virus. I would say the guidance we have at this moment based on scientific studies is the best we have. At the moment. That isn’t to say it’s perfect, but certainly it is better than what we had in March.
By "the handling" I mean the relay of information from the leading experts to the public through media outlets without confirmation that It was an incomplete set of data. I would also consider the backtracking without context of where their new information came from a bad "handling" of the situation.
I mean, just one example is Fauci's interview regarding the mask:
KELLY: On face masks, I know you have talked about the early guidance to Americans not to wear them. You've said you don't regret that guidance, that there weren't enough masks, and health care providers needed them first in the early days. My question is, why were Americans told masks don't work? If the problem was we don't have enough of them, they could help, but we don't have them, why weren't we told that?
FAUCI: Well, you know, it was I think a lot of confusion about what you mean by work. I think what was really, I think, miscommunicated was that they are not perfect. It isn't like there's 100% protection. But one of the...
KELLY: We were told, if I may, sir, by the Surgeon General, stop buying masks. They're not effective...
FAUCI: Yeah but - yeah.
KELLY: ...In preventing the general public from catching coronavirus. That's what we were told. That's a tweet from him, Feb. 29.
FAUCI: Yeah, I know. I - you know, I don't want to go back and analyze a tweet. But to tell you now the data that we have right now - one of the things that has actually happened was a realization that we have such a high percentage of people who are asymptomatic and who we know can spread the infection. And that was one of the major driving forces of getting people to say, wait a minute, we have a different situation now. We have people who may not even know they're infected and are inadvertently infecting others. Those are the ones that we want to have masks on. And we know we can protect the others who are on the other side of that mask. It isn't 100% protection by any means. But certainly the amount that you get is worth wearing it.
I think everyone needs to be more transparent and less partisan. I mean if Fauci came out and had data and numbers I think people would be more likely look past the dozens of erroneous incidents from all of these people.