ADVERTISEMENT

Boom Natural Immunity

Crazyhole said:
Calling bullshit on this. You're just making up fake anecdotal stories now.
Click to expand...
Of course it would shock you. It’s real life and you’re living in your basement in your WC fantasyland. I’m super short today because of you dickheads
 
UCFBS said:
Gotta start renaming people ...
  • 85MightsKnowEverything
  • Boosted87toICU
  • KnightCrime2NoVax
  • UCFMandates
BTW, I forked a new thread because ... we honestly won't know things for years.

SARS-CoV-2 - We won't know much until later this decade ...

I'm forking this, because this is really a thread that is going to last the 2020s. I started writing something here, in the 'Natural Immunity' thread, but ... this isn't even about 'Natural Immunity' any more. What I find is we have largely 3 groups... Group 1: Vocal Majority - Certainty...
ucf.forums.rivals.com ucf.forums.rivals.com
Click to expand...

You know it's funny because the first time I ever saw your user name I read it as UCF Bull Shit.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ucfmikes
UCFBS said:
Yep ... which is why UCFMandate doesn't understand what's been point from Day 1. In fact, even if she exists, he's asking/telling her things that have nothing to do with what we've said, much less asserted.

UCFMandate is still acting like if everyone is vaccinated, no one gets sick. That wasn't even true during Delta, or even Alpha/Wuhan-1 for that matter.
Click to expand...
Once again let me spell this out in a language that MAYBE A NARCISSIST CAN READ

YOU ARE AN ANTI-VAXER, ANTI-GOVERNMENT, ANTI-BIG PHARMA CONSPIRACY THEORIST WHO IS INDIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR MURDERING COUNTLESS INNOCENT PEOPLE DUE TO SPREADING MISINFORMATION HERE AND THROUGHOUT SOCIAL MEDIA. YOU LACK SELF-AWARENESS AND HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO BE WRONG TIME AND TIME AGAIN REGARDING COVID
AND VACCINES. YOUR INCREDIBLE LACK OF SELF-AWARENESS AND EXTREME NARCISSIM DOES NOT ALLOW YOU TO SEE THAT

ADDITIONALLY, THE ABOVE TRAITS HAVE MADE POSSIBLY A ONCE PROMISING CAREER INTO A COMPLETE FAILURE. YOU’RE INSECURE ABOUT THAT, BUT WE ARE NOT FOOLED BY YOU

YOU’RE AN UNHEALTHY 400lb MAN WITH A FAILED CAREER WHO
LIVES IN A SHACK IN RURAL ALABAMA. YOU ARE NOW AT BEST A PART-TIME I.T. SPECIALIST WHO PERFORMS ODD JOBS
WHEN YOU CAN GET ONE AND KEEP IT UNTIL THEY CAN’T STAND YOU.

READ THIS 10 TIMES!
 
Ucfmikes said:
Of course it would shock you. It’s real life and you’re living in your basement in your WC fantasyland. I’m super short today because of you dickheads
Click to expand...
Yes. It's totally believable that you are "super short" today because a nurse called in sick because she has covid for the 3rd time.
 
Mike is so short-staffed today hes only had time to post 17 times this afternoon. Damn that nurse who has covid for the 3rd time!!!!!!!
 
Boosted87 said:
Absolutely open minded and I'll be the first to tell you that you're going to have major problems with consistency and methodology from state to state, country to country, etc. It's very hard to compare this apples-to-apples.

Go to the HealthFirst facebook page and you can see the data for the biggest health care system in Brevard. They posted the data daily through large chunks of the Delta and Omicron surges. Their public data has consistently been 95%+ unvaxed for COVID positive inpatients.

The latest post (today at 9:00 am) is 99.3% unvaxed. They have 133 total inpatients so that's literally 1 vaccinated and 132 not. The image they shared today is posted below.

Now - I'm not here to defend their data. My understanding is that this is a real time snap-shot based on patients responding to vaccine status questions. I don't know what their classification rules are. I'd assume this is a very strict standard since it's at 99%. I know for employees, they're considered "unvaxxed" if they hit 6 months without a booster, so I'm assuming this would include 2 dose patients who haven't gotten a booster after 6 months.


273161579_4828547473859520_2959483265107105021_n.jpg
Click to expand...
This is an honest question. Do you know if Health First, or any other hospital system, list their admission guidelines for treatment for COVID-19? Are they the same for vaxxed and unvaxxed?
 
Crazyhole said:
Yes. It's totally believable that you are "super short" today because a nurse called in sick because she has covid for the 3rd time.
Click to expand...
No shit for brains. She’s had it twice. I don’t really care what you’re celibate, pedophile, unemployed ass thinks
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crazyhole
Crazyhole said:
Mike is so short-staffed today hes only had time to post 17 times this afternoon. Damn that nurse who has covid for the 3rd time!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

 
goodknightfl said:
I love those in the hospital with Covid. Keeps them off the road.
Click to expand...
Mike knows a nurse that has covid for a 3rd time. I hope she/he is also off the road. Definitely has to have brain fog by now.

(It's totally not a completely made-up story that Mike tried to pass off as evidence of something about vaccines, I promise.)
 
  • Love
Reactions: UCFBS
Crazyhole said:
Mike knows a nurse that has covid for a 3rd time. I hope she/he is also off the road. Definitely has to have brain fog by now.

(It's totally not a completely made-up story that Mike tried to pass off as evidence of something about vaccines, I promise.)
Click to expand...

thumb_tell-omg-imgoing-to-everyone-about-this-has-no-friends-lonely-53192384.png
 
Crazyhole said:
Mike knows a nurse that has covid for a 3rd time. I hope she/he is also off the road. Definitely has to have brain fog by now.

(It's totally not a completely made-up story that Mike tried to pass off as evidence of something about vaccines, I promise.)
Click to expand...

truman-show.gif
 
Boosted87 said:
I mean, we all know what the Water Cooler is.

But I don't come on here for a circle jerk of people who agree with me on everything. I come on here specifically to hear opinions of people who disagree with me. Personally, I think the name-calling that some of you guys do is what ruins the little value the board has.
Click to expand...

Respectfully disagree. The whole "respect both sides of the argument" thing is utter bullshit, unless you think there is value in wrong information. Do you think there is any point in an astronomer debating on flat earth forums?

Boosted87 said:
You know it's funny because the first time I ever saw your user name I read it as UCF Bull Shit.
Click to expand...

This is one of the many reasons why he's just a troll trying to make libertarians look idiotic. No one is honestly as stupid as he's pretending to be on here.
 
KNIGHTTIME^ said:
No they had a janitor meeting and it was discussed so it's 100% true.
Click to expand...

😂😂😂😂😂😂

  1. The pandemic of the “unvaccinated” who love to prolong pandemics and post Twitter and Google articles without actually reading them​

    I have a degree from UCF so what does that say? I could retire at
    Multiple technical certificates and licenses.     Must be lucky. 😉 I wouldn't say either way if I got vaccinated for the record. I've already said it is looking more and more like it is safe. Need a lab created vaccine for...
 
KNIGHTTIME^ said:
No they had a janitor meeting and it was discussed so it's 100% true.
Click to expand...
@KNIGHTTIME^ 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Technical degree
Means that the degree you got from a school is not accredited except at the school itself. There is a standard degree in which at the least takes 4 years and there is a technical degree which can take as little as 4 weeks. Usually the schools that offer technical degrees are for-profit private schools which tend to butcher the course. Such as taking out the standard liberal art requirements, Taking out the requirements for advanced classes, etc.

For the most part they are not accepted by other schools except the school you got it from. They tend to not be valued by employers. Due to the fact that if a diploma says Masters(type of degree) on it it technically doesn't mean anything.
 
Crazyhole said:
Don't bother Mike. He's super backlogged because one of the "nurses" has covid for a 3rd time. There's no way he has enough time to respond to you.
Click to expand...
“Maher nailed it Crazy. I know you’re celibate, but can you at least use your unemployment check to take me to McDonald’s” -Judy




51U8joTfKfL._AC_SX466_.jpg
 
KNIGHTTIME^ said:
No they had a janitor meeting and it was discussed so it's 100% true.
Click to expand...
I used call those 'Come to [Janitor's] Closet' meetings.

No, seriously, a subordinate of mine used the 'Come to Jesus' phrase once in DC (PC hell), and I had to hastily re-direct, and when I pointed to the Janitor's Closet, and said it, it kinda just 'stuck.'

Later on people thought it meant 'Come to [Data] Closet,' kinda a play on the fact that it was at one of the largest (at least publicly acknowledged) federal Data Centers in the country, and I called it the 'Data Closet.' But no, it literally meant the Janitor's Closet.

Because we were going to be meeting with 'dirty people' who didn't know WTF they were doing, and should have no say, but ... we had to work with them.


Boosted87 said:
You know it's funny because the first time I ever saw your user name I read it as UCF Bull Shit.
Click to expand...
That's intentional. ;)

My real life initials are 'BS' and
considering how much detail I've always produced in everthing I've written, as well as the plethora of articles and chapters in books I've had published, it's always stuck. Professionally, I've always been known as 'BS' on everything from the LKML since '94 thru about '05, about 5 years into my independent consulting career.

E.g., every time I used to walk into a client, especially for only a 1-3 week engagement, they'd always complaint about my lack of documentation from prior consultants. It used to be a great ice breaker ... "I'll give you no shortage of documentation by the time I'm done, whether it's useful or not, well ... my initials aren't 'BS' for nothing."

It was only then, when I was contracted (later employed) by Big Tech that they made me change it to 'bjs,' right down to e-mail addresses
(bjs@redhat, bjs@hp, et al.)
, although that had another, more sexual, connotation that people exploited at times.

Ugh, one of those was really bad by one of my subordinates in front of a large client's C-level
("BJ's at Red Hat")
.
 
Last edited:
Crazyhole said:
Don't bother Mike. He's super backlogged because one of the "nurses" has covid for a 3rd time. There's no way he has enough time to respond to you.
Click to expand...
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@
Crazyhole

I hate christmas.​

They moved in with their mom in january and things have been pretty difficult between us since then. Nobody, including my wife, has been terribly supportive of what I've been dealing with this year and I've been putting on a happy face whenever I'm asked how things are, however I cry and contemplate killing myself every day.
 
UCFBS said:
I used call those 'Come to [Janitor's] Closet' meetings.

No, seriously, a subordinate of mine used the 'Come to Jesus' phrase once in DC (PC hell), and I had to hastily re-direct, and when I pointed to the Janitor's Closet, and said it, it kinda just 'stuck.'

Later on people thought it meant 'Come to [Data] Closet,' kinda a play on the fact that it was at one of the largest (at least publicly acknowledge) federal Data Centers in the country, and I called it the 'Data Closet.' But no, it literally meant the Janitor's Closet.

Because we were going to be meeting with 'dirty people' who didn't know WTF they were doing, and should have no say, but ... we had to work with them.



That's intentional. ;)

My real life initials are 'BS' and
considering how much detail I've always produced in everthing I've written, as well as the plethora of articles and chapters in books I've had published, it's always stuck. Professionally, I've always been known as 'BS' on everything from the LKML since '94 thru about '05, about 5 years into my independent consulting career.

E.g., every time I used to walk into a client, especially for only a 1-3 week engagement, they'd always complaint about my lack of documentation from prior consultants. It used to be a great ice breaker ... "I'll give you no shortage of documentation by the time I'm done, whether it's useful or not, well ... my initials aren't 'BS' for nothing."

It was only then, when I was contracted (later employed) by Big Tech that they made me change it to 'bjs,' right down to e-mail addresses
(bjs@redhat, bjs@hp, et al.)
, although that had another, more sexual, connotation that people exploited at times.

Ugh, one of those was really bad by one of my subordinates in front of a large client's C-level
("BJ's at Red Hat")
.
Click to expand...
UCFBS said:
I used call those 'Come to [Janitor's] Closet' meetings.

No, seriously, a subordinate of mine used the 'Come to Jesus' phrase once in DC (PC hell), and I had to hastily re-direct, and when I pointed to the Janitor's Closet, and said it, it kinda just 'stuck.'

Later on people thought it meant 'Come to [Data] Closet,' kinda a play on the fact that it was at one of the largest (at least publicly acknowledge) federal Data Centers in the country, and I called it the 'Data Closet.' But no, it literally meant the Janitor's Closet.

Because we were going to be meeting with 'dirty people' who didn't know WTF they were doing, and should have no say, but ... we had to work with them.



That's intentional. ;)

My real life initials are 'BS' and
considering how much detail I've always produced in everthing I've written, as well as the plethora of articles and chapters in books I've had published, it's always stuck. Professionally, I've always been known as 'BS' on everything from the LKML since '94 thru about '05, about 5 years into my independent consulting career.

E.g., every time I used to walk into a client, especially for only a 1-3 week engagement, they'd always complaint about my lack of documentation from prior consultants. It used to be a great ice breaker ... "I'll give you no shortage of documentation by the time I'm done, whether it's useful or not, well ... my initials aren't 'BS' for nothing."

It was only then, when I was contracted (later employed) by Big Tech that they made me change it to 'bjs,' right down to e-mail addresses
(bjs@redhat, bjs@hp, et al.)
, although that had another, more sexual, connotation that people exploited at times.

Ugh, one of those was really bad by one of my subordinates in front of a large client's C-level
("BJ's at Red Hat")
.
Click to expand...
Once again let me spell this out in a language that MAYBE A NARCISSIST CAN READ

YOU ARE AN ANTI-VAXER, ANTI-GOVERNMENT, ANTI-BIG PHARMA CONSPIRACY THEORIST WHO IS INDIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR MURDERING COUNTLESS INNOCENT PEOPLE DUE TO SPREADING MISINFORMATION HERE AND THROUGHOUT SOCIAL MEDIA. YOU LACK SELF-AWARENESS AND HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO BE WRONG TIME AND TIME AGAIN REGARDING COVID
AND VACCINES. YOUR INCREDIBLE LACK OF SELF-AWARENESS AND EXTREME NARCISSIM DOES NOT ALLOW YOU TO SEE THAT

ADDITIONALLY, THE ABOVE TRAITS HAVE MADE POSSIBLY A ONCE PROMISING CAREER INTO A COMPLETE FAILURE. YOU’RE INSECURE ABOUT THAT, BUT WE ARE NOT FOOLED BY YOU

YOU’RE AN UNHEALTHY 400lb MAN WITH A FAILED CAREER WHO
LIVES IN A SHACK IN RURAL ALABAMA. YOU ARE NOW AT BEST A PART-TIME I.T. SPECIALIST WHO PERFORMS ODD JOBS
WHEN YOU CAN GET ONE AND KEEP IT UNTIL THEY CAN’T STAND YOU.

READ THIS 10 TIMES!
 
Whenever you need COVID and vaccine advice, turn to your failure in life, parade float, I.T. Specialist.

UCFoBeSE


Captain-Underpanties-1024x683.jpg
 
Boosted87 said:
Absolutely open minded and I'll be the first to tell you that you're going to have major problems with consistency and methodology from state to state, country to country, etc. It's very hard to compare this apples-to-apples.

Go to the HealthFirst facebook page and you can see the data for the biggest health care system in Brevard. They posted the data daily through large chunks of the Delta and Omicron surges. Their public data has consistently been 95%+ unvaxed for COVID positive inpatients.

The latest post (today at 9:00 am) is 99.3% unvaxed. They have 133 total inpatients so that's literally 1 vaccinated and 132 not. The image they shared today is posted below.

Now - I'm not here to defend their data. My understanding is that this is a real time snap-shot based on patients responding to vaccine status questions. I don't know what their classification rules are. I'd assume this is a very strict standard since it's at 99%. I know for employees, they're considered "unvaxxed" if they hit 6 months without a booster, so I'm assuming this would include 2 dose patients who haven't gotten a booster after 6 months.


273161579_4828547473859520_2959483265107105021_n.jpg
Click to expand...

So you have to understand the underlying raw data, which cannot be done here. Generally any numbers like that are almost a lock to be propaganda.

Effectively, they are saying 1 out of 133 people are hospitalized. There are a few explanations:

* the 'unvaccinated' here are an unusual number children in the hospital WITH covid.

* The admin is cooking the books, or 'accidentally misrepresented the data. When they say Health First has 133 COVID-19-positive inpatients; 99.2% of whom are unvaccinated. Do they really mean, we have 133 covid positive patients today, and OVER THE LAST YEAR 99.2% are unvaccinated. Even that is BS, but I would imagine that's what they are trying to say. It's one of the more common propaganda tricks.

Now it's no big secret that we have been shall we say 'cautious' lately with in-patient covid care for children. Kid comes in with a runny nose. Gets a covid test. In patient. Or worse, kid has RSV and really is sick. Boom covid positive (both false and real).

Follow the $$$. In-patient covid care is heavily incentivized. Hence, a kid with a sniffle a nurse can watch over 12 of them at a time. Like an expensive baby sitter.

Link to my previous discussions on how the books are cooked. Certainly at the Federal level and by a certain subgroup of hospital admins in their local reporting like you pointed me to. Everywhere else in the world is 80% vaccinated in the hospitals and deaths. The US is no different I'm afraid, we just don't have any adjudication on our public facing data.

Nm

Hey clown show. We were sold it was 95% effective against symptomatic covid. 95% effective against hospitalization and death.
ucf.forums.rivals.com ucf.forums.rivals.com
 
Boosted - I should also mention that the Brevard system may be adhering to the CDC guidelines of 'vaccinated'. As we discussed earlier, it's a lot more stringent. If you don't have an electronic record at the admitting hospital you are unvaccinated. Since they don't publish it, we'll never know.
 
Boston.Knight said:
So you have to understand the underlying raw data, which cannot be done here. Generally any numbers like that are almost a lock to be propaganda.

Effectively, they are saying 1 out of 133 people are hospitalized. There are a few explanations:

* the 'unvaccinated' here are an unusual number children in the hospital WITH covid.

* The admin is cooking the books, or 'accidentally misrepresented the data. When they say Health First has 133 COVID-19-positive inpatients; 99.2% of whom are unvaccinated. Do they really mean, we have 133 covid positive patients today, and OVER THE LAST YEAR 99.2% are unvaccinated. Even that is BS, but I would imagine that's what they are trying to say. It's one of the more common propaganda tricks.

Now it's no big secret that we have been shall we say 'cautious' lately with in-patient covid care for children. Kid comes in with a runny nose. Gets a covid test. In patient. Or worse, kid has RSV and really is sick. Boom covid positive (both false and real).

Follow the $$$. In-patient covid care is heavily incentivized. Hence, a kid with a sniffle a nurse can watch over 12 of them at a time. Like an expensive baby sitter.

Link to my previous discussions on how the books are cooked. Certainly at the Federal level and by a certain subgroup of hospital admins in their local reporting like you pointed me to. Everywhere else in the world is 80% vaccinated in the hospitals and deaths. The US is no different I'm afraid, we just don't have any adjudication on our public facing data.

Nm

Hey clown show. We were sold it was 95% effective against symptomatic covid. 95% effective against hospitalization and death.
ucf.forums.rivals.com ucf.forums.rivals.com
Click to expand...

killer-charles.gif
 
Boston.Knight said:
Boosted - I should also mention that the Brevard system may be adhering to the CDC guidelines of 'vaccinated'. As we discussed earlier, it's a lot more stringent. If you don't have an electronic record at the admitting hospital you are unvaccinated. Since they don't publish it, we'll never know.
Click to expand...

IT​

Stands for "Information Technology," and is pronounced "I.T." It refers to anything related to computing technology, such as networking, hardware, software, the Internet, or the people that work with these technologies. Many companies now have IT departments for managing the computers, networks, and other technical areas of their businesses. IT jobs include computer programming, network administration, computer engineering, Web development, technical support, and many other related occupations. Since we live in the "information age," information technology has become a part of our everyday lives. That means the term "IT," already highly overused, is here to stay.
 
Boston.Knight said:
Boosted - I should also mention that the Brevard system may be adhering to the CDC guidelines of 'vaccinated'. As we discussed earlier, it's a lot more stringent. If you don't have an electronic record at the admitting hospital you are unvaccinated. Since they don't publish it, we'll never know.
Click to expand...

It’s also being ridiculed by others. Apparently first health is unresponsive to any inquiries on the 99.2% claim 💰🤦‍♀️

 
Boston.Knight said:
It’s also being ridiculed by others. Apparently first health is unresponsive to any inquiries on the 99.2% claim 💰🤦‍♀️

View embedded media
Click to expand...
Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines
Updated Feb. 2, 2022
Languages

What You Need to Know​

  • COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.
  • Millions of people in the United States have received COVID-19 vaccines under the most intense safety monitoring in US history.
  • CDC recommends you get a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as possible.
  • If you are fully vaccinated, you can resume many activities that you did prior to the pandemic. Learn more about what you can do when you have been fully vaccinated.


Hundreds of Millions of People Have Safely Received a COVID-19 Vaccine​


More than 539 million doses of COVID-19 vaccine had been given in the United States from December 14, 2020, through January 31, 2022. To view the current total number of COVID-19 vaccinations that have been administered in the United States, please visit the CDC COVID Data Tracker.
COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective. COVID-19 vaccines were evaluated in tens of thousands of participants in clinical trials. The vaccines met the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) rigorous scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality needed to support emergency use authorization (EUA). Learn more about EUAs in this video.external icon
The Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson/Janssen COVID-19 vaccines will continue to undergo the most intensive safety monitoring in US history. This monitoring includes using both established and new safety monitoring systems to make sure that COVID-19 vaccines are safe.

Common Side Effects​

After COVID-19 vaccination, some people may feel ill, with symptoms like fever or tiredness for a day or two after receiving the vaccine. These symptoms are normal and are signs that the body is building immunity. Some people have no side effects. Others have reported common side effects after COVID-19 vaccination,such as:
  • Swelling, redness, and pain at the injection site
  • Fever
  • Headache
  • Tiredness
  • Muscle pain
  • Chills
  • Nausea

Serious Safety Problems Are Rare​

In rare cases, people have experienced serious health events after COVID-19 vaccination. Any health problem that happens after vaccination is considered an adverse event. An adverse event can be caused by the vaccine or can be caused by a coincidental event not related to the vaccine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

nosurf2day

OT: A recent study disputes the conventional belief that the body's ability to absorb more protein from a single meal is limited.

Replies
16
Views
760
The Dungeon - Knights Only
Great2BAKnight2
Great2BAKnight2
Buc_Knight

Dane Brugler NFL Draft preview UCF Focus

Replies
18
Views
2K
The Dungeon - Knights Only
James Jenson
James Jenson
UCFChargeOn

Is Georgia the next Baylor?

Replies
24
Views
2K
The Dungeon - Knights Only
litehedded
L
Brandon

Mike Aresco: An Open Letter on Power 5 - Group of 5 Branding

Replies
57
Views
2K
The Dungeon - Knights Only
UCFhockey77
UCFhockey77
Nautiknight

Fauci kicking around vax mandate to Fly

Replies
121
Views
4K
The Water Cooler
goodknightfl
goodknightfl
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back