The court could have and should have taken the case for several reasons. First, it’s their job to hold up the Constitution and it is pretty clear about who can change election laws. It isn’t a Secretary of State or any other bureaucratic group. Second, having the highest court review what has happened in this election would go a long way in calming the anxiety of citizens on both sides.
If there is nothing to these arguments, then so be it, but denying it on standing when they could just as well accepted it makes the court seem like cowards and further alienates the millions of people that are already extremely distrustful of government.
We also have to consider that a run-off election will be happening in Georgia next month with the same illegally change rule regarding ballots. How is this not addressed?
All I wanted from the beginning was to see the complaints argued in court. The 70 million people that voted for Trump deserve due process and closure.
If there is nothing to these arguments, then so be it, but denying it on standing when they could just as well accepted it makes the court seem like cowards and further alienates the millions of people that are already extremely distrustful of government.
We also have to consider that a run-off election will be happening in Georgia next month with the same illegally change rule regarding ballots. How is this not addressed?
All I wanted from the beginning was to see the complaints argued in court. The 70 million people that voted for Trump deserve due process and closure.