It does make one wonder about the rationale that one needs to be AT LEAST 35 years old to run for President but any crazy senile old fart can run and win as long as there are voters stupid enough to vote for him.
biden has looked like he didnt know where he was a times and his rambling is very odd. im not completely against age limits. maybe somewhere around 80.
The American public knows how old they are when the election cycle comes up and they make it through the primaries. But if we’re going to cross that bridge, why stop at elected positions. We should age out SCOTUS and federal judiciary as well. Probably cabinet positions and ambassadorships too.
i agree with you on giuliani sanders and biden. trump has plenty of gaffes but i think its more of him just saying/typing alot of crap. i havent seen him have that glazed look in his eyes like the others.
If this thing ever went to a court of law, then he would have that due process right. But it won’t, they all know it, and the accusation is damaging enough in this day and age where the court of public opinion is more punitive than the justice system.
My God, you act like our poor President got smeared. The partial transcript that the WHITE HOUSE ITSELF RELEASED made it crystal clear that Trump asked the Ukrainian President to do him a big favor and open an investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden.
No, he just talks a little slower when he knows the left is listening. His cadence is pretty much the same as 30 years ago:
Your indignation would be much more credible if you hadn't cried wolf on Kavanaugh and the Russia conspiracy hoax for years. I think, given the recent events, that a little due process would be a good thing for everyone.
The only difference between Kavanaugh, the Russian conspiracy "hoax" and recent events is the clear-cut evidence.
Oh come on. You railed at us about how clear cut the evidence was. The multiple accusers in Kavanaugh. All of the evidence that Mueller had. You're playing the same broken record.
LOL. That's like the pot calling the kettle black.
I will always stick with due process and not quickly jumping to conclusions based upon incomplete evidence and erroneous reporting. Glad to see we're both in our sweet spots.
Let me ask you this, Mister 'Let's not jump to Conclusions', are the allegations regarding the President's conduct a serious matter to you?
Yes. Upon reading the whistleblower’s report, I said multiple times that let’s take that complaint to the next step in the process. Which is probably an official investigation.
Of course not. No creditable source does.
and this is why i will never take the partisan hack shookster seriously. investigate them both or dont at all.
the VP is on tap talking about how he threatened to withhold aid money from an ally unless they fired someone and low and behold he was fired. those are his own words man. you are delusional. investigate them both is not a hard concept. well it is if you only look at things in a partisan manor.LOL Yeah, that would be THE FAIR MINDED thing to do, right?
You people crack me up.
No, you are ill-informed about how our Constitution works.
please apply that logic to the front runner of the dnc for the 2020 election.
Sorry, Crazy, but that pesky little Constitution we live under says determining the truth of it regarding a political rival is NOT within the boundaries of the Office of the President.
Holy. Crap.
Huh? You've lost me. How did Biden's public actions in spearheading the removal of the Ukrainian prosecutor apply?
i thought you didnt want a corrupt person as potus. biden is on tap bragging about how he used his ability to withold aid unless someone was fired, and by joe he was fired. last i checked biden was the front runner of the dnc. why shouldnt it be looked into?
The exact same situation?
Without a formal investigation into Biden how will we ever know?The exact same situation?
So the Biden campaign is engaged in secret meetings with agents of the Russian government and then lying about them to the public?
I could have sworn the Biden thing was about his role in pressuring a corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor to resign back in 2014.
It's been remarkable to observe the lengths Trump supports will go in their efforts to establish a moral equivalency for Trump's misdeeds.
i just want the truth. if biden did nothing wrong, he shouldnt be worried about a formal investigation.
I suppose the fact the Ukrainian investigation into the company that Hunter Biden began working for took place before Hunter came aboard as well as the fact that the Ukrainians have said publicly on multiple occasions that 'Hunter Biden did not violate any Ukrainian laws' is...what? Irrelevant? We've simply GOT to pursue this red herring anyway, right?
Lol, irony springs eternalI suppose the fact the Ukrainian investigation into the company that Hunter Biden began working for took place before Hunter came aboard as well as the fact that the Ukrainians have said publicly on multiple occasions that 'Hunter Biden did not violate any Ukrainian laws' is...what? Irrelevant? We've simply GOT to pursue this red herring anyway, right?
Hope springs eternal. You never know if a fishing expedition might yield something...particularly if you put enough pressure on the fishermen, right boys?
